You are to work in teams of two to four.
If you need help in finding classmates to form a team, I will provide it.
Each team should begin by choosing a topic and then performing some
preliminary research. The purpose of this is to find potential sources
of information (e.g., books, journal/magazine/newspaper articles, web sites,
etc.) and to help you focus upon what particular aspect of your topic you
want to explore. (Your paper will be relatively short; thus, your topic must
be fairly narrow.)
A good places to search for potential source materials is
scholar.google.com.
This site is especially nice in that, assuming that you submit a
query from a computer on the U of Scranton network, the response
will include hyperlinks to the full-text versions of any articles
to which the University has access.
Your e-mail's subject line should include the phrase
"CIL 102 proposal" (or something similar).
Your paper should be six to ten pages long, not including the
Works Cited page. (Note that, with double-spacing, six pages is not
all that much.) Your Works Cited page should include at least six
sources of information, at least three of which originate
from somewhere other than the World Wide Web.
(An article from The New York Times, for example, did not
originate on the WWW, regardless of whether you accessed it via the
WWW.)
E-mail your paper (in Microsoft Word form as an attachment) to
mccloskeyr1@scranton.edu
by noon, May 4, 2009. In the subject line, include
a phrase such as "C/IL 102 paper".
To learn more about the issues of plagiarism (and, more generally,
"academic integrity"), it is recommended that you go through the
U of Scranton's Scholarly Research and Academic Integrity Tutorial, to
which there is a link from
this page, which also contains links to related information.
Possible Topics
Below is a list of possible topics, which you should not regard as
being exhaustive. They are simply suggestions.
Submitting a Proposal
Having done a preliminary investigation, by April 18 one member of your team
should send an e-mail to me (as well as the other members of the team)
at mccloskeyr1@scranton.edu
identifying your team's members, describing your intended topic,
and summarizing what sources of information you have located.
It need be only a couple of paragraphs in length.
In effect, this will serve as your "proposal".
I will reply soon thereafter, letting you know whether or not your
proposal is acceptable. In the unlikely event that it is not,
I will probably give you some suggestions as to how to modify it to
make it acceptable.
(I don't foresee rejecting a proposal outright unless the topic is
totally inappropriate or it is clear that you have done no preliminary
investigation.)
Format of Term Paper
Generally follow the MLA guidelines
provided by Capital Community College in developing your paper.
In particular, adhere to the formatting guidelines reached by clicking on the
Paper Format button on the left margin.
(Exceptions: Feel free to single-space the heading (giving your names,
instructor name, etc.) as well as each citation on the Works Cited
page (but leave a blank line between two citations).
Class Presentation
Prepare a short presentation (using Microsoft Powerpoint to produce "slides")
to accompany your paper.
Your slides should be appropriate for delivering a 10-13 minute
oral presentation of your research paper, which your team will do
in class sometime during the last two weeks of class (May 4, 6, 11, or 13).
(We'll work out exact scheduling later.)
For guidelines on developing Powerpoint presentations, see
Effective Powerpoint
Presentations. (Scroll down a little from the top of the web page
to arrive there.)
E-mail your slides (as an attachment) to
mccloskeyr1@scranton.edu
preferably within the same e-mail message as the one in which you
sent your Word document.
Warning Regarding Plagiarism
As you probably know, there are a number of Web sites from which
you may purchase research papers. To hand in such a paper
(or a modified form thereof) would be a flagrant example of plagiarism.
Ah, but there exist software tools for detecting plagiarism. They are
not foolproof, but they are often effective. If I were to determine that
a submitted paper was plagiarized, I would give the offending students
a failing grade for the course and take the matter to the dean in order
to instigate further punitive action.